Abuse Law – Institutions – Bayswater Boys’ Home, VIC

The Salvation Army

The Salvation Army is a Protestant Christian church and an international charitable organisation headquartered in London, England. The Salvation Army was founded in 1865 and started work in Australia in 1880.  

Bayswater Boys’ Home, VIC

In 1897, the Salvation Army established and opened Bayswater Boys’ Home, VIC (previously been known as Bayswater Boys’ Home No 1, 2 and 3, Bayswater Youth Training Centre, Bayswater Farm and Vocational Training Centre, and Salvation Army Farm and Training Centre) situated at Liverpool Street, The Basin, east of Melbourne, Victoria.   


Bayswater Boys’ Home housed boys who had been placed in legal custody, on behalf of the Social Welfare Branch of the Government of Victoria.  


There were a number of ‘homes’ within Bayswater Boys’ Home. Home No 1 housed boys over the age of 14 years, initially those who had committed serious offences. Home No 2 housed the younger boys under the age of 14 years. Home No 3 initially housed older non-offending boys until Home No 1 Home was later combined with the Home No 3 in 1947 and became known as the Bayswater Youth Training Centre. 


The Bayswater Boys’ Homes closed progressively from 1980, and officially closed in 1987, owing a government decision to cease funding non-government agencies to run statutory facilities such as youth training centres. Bayswater Boys’ Home became the ‘Mountain Valley Youth Camp and Conference Centre’. The Youth Training Centre became part of the Salvation Army’s Bridge and Employment Programs. 

History of Abuse at Bayswater Boys’ Home, VIC

There were several submissions made to the Inquiry into Children in Institutional Care which made reference to Bayswater Boys’ Home and these persons negative experiences whilst placed there. One survivor, Mr Terry Dean, described Bayswater Boys’ Home and other Salvation Army Homes as ‘a sad reminder of a bygone age of degradation and cruelty’, and ‘the epitome of hell on earth’. 

In 2015, the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse held a public hearing looking into the experiences of former child residents of The Salvation Army (Southern Territory) institutions between 1940 and 1990. In Case Study number 33 published by the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse in July 2016, the Royal Commission found that the Salvation Army had failed in its duties and responsibilities to keep boys under its care at Bayswater Boys Home safe from any form of physical and sexual abuse. In summary, the Royal Commission concluded that the Salvation Army failed to take action against its staff and officers who were breaching Orders and Regulations prohibiting the mistreatment of children. Furthermore, the Royal Commission stated emphatically that the Salvation Army provided a culture at Bayswater in which: 

  • children felt afraid to report sexual abuse;
  • children felt powerless to resist the maltreatment; and
  • the staff and officers whose behaviour was in breach of the Orders and Regulations were able to, and did, continue the prohibited behaviour.


The Royal Commission received documentary evidence and heard first-hand accounts from many boys who were abused at Bayswater Boys Home and found that the Salvation Army failed to control the actions of two particular paedophiles – officers Brigadier Wright and Envoy Collins. 

We are specialist abuse lawyers and can help you receive acknowledgement, meaningful apology and financial resolution from those institutions and systems of power that failed to protect you from harm. If you would like advice in relation to a childhood or adult sexual, physical and/or psychological/emotional abuse claim in any jurisdiction in Australia, please reach out to the author, Emily Wright, at Littles Lawyers today. 

Further Abuse Law information written by our Emily Wright can be found on our website. 

Like? Share it with your friends.

Contact the Author


More Articles


若您因生病或受伤(或两者)而无法工作,完全和永久伤残保险 (Total and Permanent Disability Insurance,以下简称TPD保险)能让您向保险公司进行申请,领取伤残保险金。对于很多人来说,无法回到原来的职业和工作岗位对生活的收入来源造成很大的影响。不同的TPD保险政策或产品也有着不一样的定义和评定原则。希望此文能协助您了解更多关于TPD保险金的基础知识。 我的TPD索赔已被接受。这是不是意味着我不能从事任何工作? 每一个保险公司提供的TPD政策不同,对“完全和永久伤残”的定义和索赔申请被接纳后对于工作的限制有不一样的要求。一般TPD政策的定义如下:  • 不能回到您受的教育、培训以及经验相关的工作;  • 不能投入您一向来从事的职业;  • 无法进行日常生活的活动;  • 失去两肢的使用或视觉能力。  有些保险政策的评定只需要满足以上的其中一项,有一些则要求两项或以上。因此,申请伤残保险金需要详细查阅政策内容和规定。保险公司接纳您的申请后也不代表您一定要停止一切的工作。在申请保险金的当儿,能做点其他的工作除了可增加收入,更重要的是能让我们保持社交能力以及维持身心健康。若您还有工作能力转行和进行其他工作,也并不代表TPD索赔的申请必然失败。  我不太确定自己有没有受保 ,我该怎么办? 若您在澳洲工作,您是否注意到您的退休金会定期扣除一些行政费以及保险费(Insurance Premium)?很多人不太注意退休金的积累以及保费的支付。您或许没印象购买过TPD保险,但您可通过查阅您的退休金会员账号及明细,查询您的退休金机构是否附带TPD保险。这种通过退休金机构选购以及支付的保险,统称退休金伤残保险 (Superannuation-based TPD insurance)...

Read More