The Society of Mary (commonly known as the Marist Fathers) The Marist Fathers are a male Roman Catholic clerical religious...
Read MoreIn the matter of SR (a pseudonym) v Trustees of the De La Salle Brothers [2023] NSWSC 66, the plaintiff commenced court proceedings in negligence and vicarious liability against the Trustees of the De La Salle Brothers (“the De La Salle Brothers”). The plaintiff sought damages for his injuries and losses as a result of alleged sexual abuse suffered by the plaintiff whilst he was a student at De La Salle Revesby by a teacher, Mr Erol Swain (now deceased) in 1983/1984 when the plaintiff was in around Grade 6.
The plaintiff alleged that the De La Salle Brothers were aware of the tendency for the perpetrator to abuse students, particularly on the basis that two parents had complained about the perpetrator’s conduct before the plaintiff was abused. The 1967 school principal, Brother Julian, was informed that the perpetrator was interfering with students. In response, Brother Julian conducted investigations into the allegation and determined that it was safer to keep the perpetrator at De La Salle Revesby because the school knew of the problem and, therefore, could ‘keep watch’ of the perpetrator.
The defendant made a limited admission of breach and did not admit to the abuse on the basis that the perpetrator was deceased.
Both medical experts in this matter agreed that the medical diagnoses were attributable to the abuse at De La Salle Revesby by Mr Swain.
At [123], the Court accepted that the plaintiff suffered the abuse as alleged.
On vicarious liability, the Court referred to the decision of Prince Alfred College Incorporated v ADC [2016] HCA 37, and to first instance decisions in New South Wales and Victoria, before determining that the defendant was vicariously liable for the conduct of the perpetrator. Notably, the Court provided at [164]:
The plaintiff claimed damages in an amount nearing $6,000,000, requiring him to prove that but for the abuse he would have completed his schooling, not turned to drugs and not engaged in criminal conduct. At [208], the Court held that the plaintiff could not recover damages for losses said to be consequent of his criminal conduct.
The Court ultimately awarded damages in the amount of $1,145,514.50, with the breakdown as follows:
Of note, the Court did not award exemplary damages and provided at [248] that to do so would not be a punishment or deterrence of the perpetrator.
We are specialist abuse lawyers and can help you receive acknowledgement, meaningful apology and financial resolution from those institutions and systems of power that failed to protect you from harm. If you would like advice in relation to a childhood or adult sexual, physical and/or psychological/emotional abuse claim in any jurisdiction in Australia, please reach out to the author, Emily Wright, at Littles Lawyers today.
Further Abuse Law information and case law updates written by our Emily Wright can be found on our website.
The Society of Mary (commonly known as the Marist Fathers) The Marist Fathers are a male Roman Catholic clerical religious...
Read Moreสวัสดีครับวันนี้ผมได้เอาเคสตัวอย่างเกี่ยวกับสิ่งที่ทุกท่านพึงระวังหลังจากทำการเรียกร้องค่าชดเชยจากการเกิดอุบัติเหตุบนท้องถนนมาให้เพื่อน ๆ ได้อ่านกันครับ ขอท้าวความไปที่รายละเอียดของเหตุการณ์นี้ก่อนนะครับ โจทก์ Ms. Meah Baldock Davies เป็นหญิงอายุ 20 ปีที่ได้รับบาดเจ็บอันเป็นผลมาจากการถูกยานยนต์ที่ขับโดยจำเลยที่หนึ่งพุ่งชน ในขณะที่เธอกำลังเดินไปตามถนน Sunshine Boulevard, Broadbeach Waters โจทก์ได้รับบาดเจ็บที่กระดูกสันหลังส่วนคอ กระดูกสันหลังส่วนเอว ซี่โครงหักสามซี่...
Read MoreRoad accidents can be stressful and scary. Three people each day die on our roads with numerous more seriously injured....
Read More